16.3.3.2.3.1 Loan facility and bonds
The loan facility and bonds were entered into at floating interest rates.
The interest rate repricing profile for the loan facility and bonds is summarised below for group and company:
1 to 6 months Rm |
Total borrowings Rm |
|
At 31 December 2024 | ||
Non-current interest-bearing borrowings: loan facility and bond | (2 499) | (2 499) |
Current interest-bearing borrowings: loan facility and bond | (498) | (498) |
Total interest-bearing borrowings: loan facility and bond | (2 997) | (2 997) |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 100 |
At 31 December 2023 | ||
Non-current interest-bearing borrowings: loan facility and bond | (2 945) | (2 945) |
Current interest-bearing borrowings: loan facility and bond | (1 153) | (1 153) |
Total interest-bearing borrowings: loan facility and bond | (4 098) | (4 098) |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 100 |
Interest rate sensitivity
The following table reflects the potential impact on earnings, given an increase in interest rates of 50 basis points:
|
2024 Rm |
2023 Rm |
Impact on earnings: loss | (15) | (20) |
---|
A decrease in interest rates of 50 basis points would have an equal but opposite effect on the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
16.3.3.2.3.2 Project financing
The group is exposed to the risk of variability in future interest payments on the project financing, attributable to fluctuations in 3-month JIBAR, during operations phase, and 1-month JIBAR during the construction phase. The designated hedged items are the group of expected floating interest rate cash flows arising from the project financing, up to the notional amount of each interest rate swap, over the term of the hedging relationship. The notional amounts per interest rate swap match up to the designated exposure being hedged.
Where all relevant criteria are met, hedge accounting is applied to remove the accounting mismatch between the hedging instruments and the hedged items. This will effectively result in recognising interest expense at a fixed interest rate for the hedged project financing.
The exposure profile is summarised as follows:
Group | |||||
Percentage exposure | |||||
At 31 December | 2024 % |
2023 % |
2024 Rm |
2023 Rm |
|
Project financing nominal amount | 100 | 100 | (5 223) | (4 825) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
– Linked to fixed rate | 2 | 3 | (127) | (135) | |
– Linked to floating rate | 98 | 97 | (5 096) | (4 690) | |
Project financing nominal amount linked to floating rate | 98 | 97 | (5 096) | (4 690) | |
Interest rate swap notional amount (swap floating rate to fixed rate) | (74) | (83) | 3 872 | 4 002 | |
Effective floating rate exposure on project financing | 24 | 14 | (1 224) | (688) |
Interest rate sensitivity
The following table reflects the potential impact on earnings and equity, given an increase in interest rates of 50 basis points:
Group | ||
Impact | 2024 Rm |
2023 Rm |
Increase in finance costs | 6 | 3 |
---|---|---|
Increase in equity | 28 | 41 |
A decrease in interest rates of 50 basis points would have an equal but opposite effect on the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
Hedge accounting: Cash flow hedges – interest rate swaps
Hedge effectiveness
The group has assumed certain interest rate swaps from its business combination with Cennergi, as well as entered into new interest rate swaps for further project financing arrangements that have similar critical terms as the hedged item, such as reference rates, reset dates, payment dates, maturities and notional amounts. The group does not hedge 100% of its project financing, therefore the hedged item is identified as a proportion of the outstanding project financing up to the notional amount of the interest rate swaps. As all critical terms matched during the year, there is an economic relationship.
Hedge effectiveness is determined at the inception of the hedge relationships, and through periodic prospective effectiveness assessments, to ensure that an economic relationship exists between the hedged items and hedging instruments.
Hedge ineffectiveness for interest rate swaps is assessed frequently. It may occur due to:
The recognised ineffectiveness in 2024 amounted to R12 million (2023: R18 million) and is mainly as a result of the DVA. Credit valuation adjustments are not considered due to the terms of the underlying loans, which allow for set-off.
The interest rate swaps require settlement of net interest receivable or payable every six months during the operations phase, and every 1-month during construction phase. The settlement dates coincide with the dates on which interest is payable on the underlying debt.
The following tables detail the financial position and performance of the interest rate swap contracts outstanding at the end of the reporting period and their related hedged items.
Financial performance effects of hedging recognised during the year
Group | ||||
For the year ended 31 December | Line item in which recognised |
Note | 2024 Rm |
2023 Rm |
Fair value losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness | Operating expenses | 6.1.3 | (12) | (18) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fair value gains on settlement of underlying swap (reclassified from OCI) | Finance costs | 12.1.2 | 26 | 20 |
Hedging instruments and hedged items
Group | ||
At 31 December | 2024 Rm |
2023 Rm |
Hedged items: Cash flows on floating rate project financing linked to JIBAR | ||
Nominal amount | 3 872 | 4 002 |
Carrying amount in cash flow hedge reserve | (35) | 17 |
Cumulative gains in fair value used for calculating hedge ineffectiveness | 47 | 7 |
Hedging instruments: Outstanding receive floating, pay fixed contracts | ||
Nominal amount | 3 872 | 4 002 |
Carrying amount | (128) | (125) |
– Non-current financial asset | 1 | 2 |
– Non-current financial liability | (129) | (127) |
Cumulative losses in fair value used for calculating hedge ineffectiveness | (203) | (209) |
Hedging reserves
Cash flow hedge reserves composition:
Group | ||
At 31 December | 2024 Rm |
2023 Rm |
Cash flow hedge reserve – interest rate swaps | (26) | 12 |
---|---|---|
– Gross | (35) | 17 |
– Deferred tax thereon | 9 | (5) |
Cash flow hedge reserve – spot element of FECs | 2 | (6) |
– Gross | 3 | (8) |
– Deferred tax thereon | (1) | 2 |
Balance of share of movements of equity-accounted investees | (87) | |
Balance of NCI share of financial instruments revaluation reserve | (33) | |
Cash flow hedge reserves | (111) | (27) |
Movement analysis of cash flow hedge reserve – interest rate swaps:
Liquidity risk is the risk that the group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The group's approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the group's reputation.
The ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the board of directors, which has built an appropriate liquidity risk management framework for the management of the group's short, medium and long-term funding and liquidity management requirements.
The group manages liquidity risk by monitoring forecast cash flows in compliance with loan covenants and ensuring that adequate unutilised borrowing facilities are maintained.
Borrowing capacity is determined by the board of directors, from time to time.
Group | ||
2024 Rm |
2023 Rm |
|
Amount approved | 67 484 | 65 309 |
---|---|---|
Total borrowings | (8 220) | (8 923) |
Unutilised borrowing capacity | 59 264 | 56 386 |
The group's capital base and the borrowing powers of the company and the group were set at 125% of shareholders' funds (equity attributable to owners of the parent) for both the 2024 and 2023 financial years.
Standard payment terms for the majority of trade payables is the end of the month following the month in which the goods are received or services are rendered. A number of trade payables do, however, have shorter contracted payment periods.
To avoid incurring interest on late payments, financial risk management policies and procedures are entrenched to ensure the timeous matching of orders placed with goods received notes or services acceptances and invoices.
Contractual cash flows for financial instruments which are subject to floating interest rates are based on the closing floating interest rate at reporting date.
The following tables detail the contractual maturities of certain financial assets and financial liabilities:
Group | ||||||
Maturity | ||||||
At 31 December 2024 | Carrying amount Rm |
Contractual cash flows Rm |
0 to 12 months Rm |
1 to 2 years Rm |
2 to 5 years Rm |
More than 5 years Rm |
Financial assets1 | ||||||
ESD loans | 151 | 151 | 83 | 48 | 20 | |
Vendor finance loan | 142 | 160 | 71 | 53 | 36 | |
Intervention receivable | 8 | 8 | 8 | |||
Investment deposits | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||
Cash flow hedge derivatives: interest rate swaps | 1 | |||||
Derivative financial assets | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Lease receivables | 29 | 34 | 14 | 14 | 6 | |
Trade and other receivables | 4 230 | 4 230 | 4 230 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 20 630 | 20 630 | 20 630 | |||
Total financial assets | 25 197 | 25 219 | 25 042 | 115 | 62 | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 99 | 1 | |||
Financial liabilities | ||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | (8 220) | (12 061) | (1 737) | (3 558) | (3 257) | (3 509) |
– Loan facility | (2 997) | (3 370) | (785) | (2 585) | ||
– Project financing | (5 223) | (8 691) | (952) | (973) | (3 257) | (3 509) |
Lease liabilities | (430) | (659) | (101) | (109) | (266) | (183) |
Non-current other payables | (40) | (40) | (3) | (37) | ||
Trade and other payables | (3 351) | (3 352) | (3 352) | |||
Cash flow hedge derivatives: interest rate swaps | (129) | (157) | (55) | (42) | (57) | (3) |
Derivative financial liabilities | (22) | (22) | (22) | |||
Total financial liabilities | (12 192) | (16 291) | (5 267) | (3 712) | (3 617) | (3 695) |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 32 | 23 | 22 | 23 | |
Liquidity gap identified2 | 13 005 | 8 928 | 19 775 | (3 597) | (3 555) | (3 695) |
1 | Excludes the environmental rehabilitation funds at amortised cost of R118 million. |
2 | The liquidity gap identified will be funded by cash generated from operations and the undrawn facilities in place. |
Group | ||||||
Maturity | ||||||
At 31 December 2023 | Carrying amount Rm |
Contractual cash flows Rm |
0 to 12 months Rm |
1 to 2 years Rm |
2 to 5 years Rm |
More than 5 years Rm |
Financial assets | ||||||
ESD loans | 169 | 169 | 63 | 49 | 57 | |
Vendor finance loan | 177 | 216 | 64 | 60 | 92 | |
Other financial assets at amortised cost1 | 75 | 78 | 78 | |||
Cash flow hedge derivatives: interest rate swaps | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Derivative financial assets | 22 | 22 | 22 | |||
Lease receivables | 38 | 48 | 14 | 14 | 20 | |
Trade and other receivables | 3 877 | 3 877 | 3 877 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 19 859 | 19 859 | 19 859 | |||
Total financial assets | 24 219 | 24 272 | 23 978 | 124 | 170 | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 98 | 1 | 1 | ||
Financial liabilities | ||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | (8 923) | (12 924) | (2 388) | (1 623) | (5 555) | (3 358) |
– Loan facility | (3 452) | (4 183) | (852) | (743) | (2 588) | |
– Project financing | (4 825) | (8 062) | (857) | (880) | (2 967) | (3 358) |
– Bonds | (646) | (679) | (679) | |||
Lease liabilities | (451) | (668) | (95) | (101) | (325) | (147) |
Non-current other payables | (42) | (44) | (16) | (28) | ||
Trade and other payables | (3 356) | (3 356) | (3 356) | |||
Cash flow hedge derivatives: interest rate swaps | (127) | (105) | (30) | (30) | (42) | (3) |
Cash flow hedge derivatives: FECs | (14) | (21) | (21) | |||
Total financial liabilities | (12 913) | (17 118) | (5 890) | (1 770) | (5 950) | (3 508) |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 34 | 10 | 35 | 21 | |
Liquidity gap identified2 | 11 306 | 7 154 | 18 088 | (1 646) | (5 780) | (3 508) |
1 | Excludes the environmental rehabilitation funds at amortised cost of R108 million. |
2 | The liquidity gap identified will be funded by cash generated from operations and the undrawn facilities in place. |
Company | |||||
Maturity | |||||
At 31 December 2024 | Carrying amount Rm |
Contractual cash flows Rm |
0 to 12 months Rm |
1 to 2 years Rm |
2 to 5 years Rm |
Financial assets | |||||
ESD loans | 151 | 151 | 83 | 48 | 20 |
Vendor finance loan | 142 | 160 | 71 | 53 | 36 |
Investment deposits | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||
Trade and other receivables | 237 | 237 | 237 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | 17 300 | 17 300 | 17 300 | ||
Non-interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 701 | 701 | 701 | ||
Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 3 002 | 3 379 | 792 | 2 587 | |
Treasury facilities with subsidiaries | 69 | 69 | 69 | ||
Total financial assets | 21 606 | 22 001 | 19 257 | 2 688 | 56 |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 88 | 12 | ||
Financial liabilities | |||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | (2 997) | (3 370) | (785) | (2 585) | |
– Loan facility | (2 997) | (3 370) | (785) | (2 585) | |
Lease liabilities | (342) | (429) | (91) | (99) | (239) |
Trade and other payables | (216) | (216) | (216) | ||
Non-interest-bearing loans from subsidiaries1 | (92) | (92) | (92) | ||
Treasury facilities with subsidiaries | (14 936) | (14 936) | (14 936) | ||
Total financial liabilities | (18 583) | (19 043) | (16 120) | (2 684) | (239) |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 85 | 14 | 1 | |
Liquidity gap identified | 3 023 | 2 958 | 3 137 | 4 | (183) |
1 | The majority of the non-interest-bearing loans from subsidiaries are not expected to be called upon in the foreseeable future. |
Company | ||||||
Maturity | ||||||
At 31 December 2023 | Carrying amount Rm |
Contractual cash flows Rm |
0 to 12 months Rm |
1 to 2 years Rm |
2 to 5 years Rm |
More than 5 years Rm |
Financial assets | ||||||
ESD loans | 169 | 169 | 63 | 49 | 57 | |
Vendor finance loan | 177 | 216 | 64 | 60 | 92 | |
Trade and other receivables | 150 | 150 | 150 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 17 151 | 17 151 | 17 151 | |||
Non-interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 575 | 575 | 575 | |||
Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 4 139 | 4 931 | 1 540 | 750 | 2 641 | |
Treasury facilities with subsidiaries | 130 | 130 | 130 | |||
Total financial assets | 22 491 | 23 322 | 19 673 | 859 | 2 790 | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 84 | 4 | 12 | ||
Financial liabilities | ||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | (4 098) | (4 862) | (1 531) | (743) | (2 588) | |
– Loan facility | (3 452) | (4 183) | (852) | (743) | (2 588) | |
– Bonds | (646) | (679) | (679) | |||
Lease liabilities | (383) | (505) | (85) | (92) | (301) | (27) |
Trade and other payables | (223) | (223) | (223) | |||
Non-interest-bearing loans from subsidiaries1 | (769) | (769) | (769) | |||
Treasury facilities with subsidiaries | (14 837) | (14 837) | (14 837) | |||
Total financial liabilities | (20 310) | (21 196) | (17 445) | (835) | (2 889) | (27) |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 82 | 4 | 14 | ||
Liquidity gap identified | 2 181 | 2 126 | 2 228 | 24 | (99) | (27) |
1 | The majority of the non-interest-bearing loans from subsidiaries are not expected to be called upon in the foreseeable future. |
Credit risk relates to potential default by counterparties on cash and cash equivalents, loans, investments, trade receivables and other receivables.
The group limits its counterparty exposure arising from money market and derivative instruments by only dealing with well established financial institutions of high-credit standing. The group's exposure and credit ratings of its counterparties are continuously monitored and the aggregate value of transactions concluded are spread among approved counterparties. Credit exposure is controlled by counterparty limits that are reviewed and approved by the audit committee annually.
Trade receivables consist of a number of customers with whom Exxaro has long-standing relationships. A high portion of term supply arrangements exists with such customers resulting in limited credit exposure which exposure is limited by performing customer creditworthiness or country risk assessments.
The group strives to enter into sales contracts with customers which stipulate the required payment terms. It is expected of each customer that these payment terms are adhered to. Where trade receivables balances become past due, the normal recovery procedures are followed to recover the debt, where applicable new payment terms may be arranged to ensure that the debt is fully recovered.
Exxaro has concentration risk as a result of its exposure to one major customer. This is, however, not considered significant as the customer adheres to the stipulated payment terms.
Exxaro establishes an allowance for non-recoverability or impairment that represents its estimate of ECLs in respect of trade receivables, other receivables, loans, cash and cash equivalents and investments. The main components of these allowances are a 12-month ECL component that results from possible default events within the 12 months after the reporting date and a lifetime ECL component that results from all possible default events over the expected life of a financial instrument.
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. None of the financial assets were held as collateral for any security provided.
Detail of the trade receivables credit risk exposure:
Group | ||
At 31 December | 2024 % |
2023 % |
By geographical area | ||
RSA | 70 | 77 |
Europe | 6 | 9 |
Asia | 21 | 8 |
Australia | 4 | |
USA | 3 | 2 |
Total | 100 | 100 |
By industry | ||
Public utilities | 59 | 54 |
Mining | 2 | 5 |
Manufacturing | 1 | 1 |
Merchants | 31 | 28 |
Food and beverage | 1 | |
Steel | 6 | 6 |
Cement | 1 | 1 |
Other | 4 | |
Total | 100 | 100 |
Detailed impairment analysis of financial assets measured at amortised cost:
Group | |||||
At 31 December 2024 | Total Rm |
Performing Rm |
Under- performing Rm |
Non- performing Rm |
|
ESD loans | 151 | 151 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
– Non-current – gross | 131 | 68 | 63 | ||
– Non-current – impairment allowances | (63) | (63) | |||
– Current – gross | 247 | 84 | 163 | ||
– Current – impairment allowances | (164) | (1) | (163) | ||
Vendor finance loan | 142 | 142 | |||
– Non-current – gross | 81 | 81 | |||
– Non-current – impairment allowance | (1) | (1) | |||
– Current – gross | 63 | 63 | |||
– Current – impairment allowance | (1) | (1) | |||
Intervention receivable | 8 | 8 | |||
– Current – gross | 8 | 8 | |||
Investment deposits | 4 | 4 | |||
– Current – gross | 4 | 4 | |||
Other financial assets at amortised cost | 118 | 118 | |||
– Non-current – gross | 118 | 118 | |||
– Current – gross | 4 | 4 | |||
– Current – impairment allowances | (4) | (4) | |||
Lease receivables1 | 29 | 29 | |||
– Non-current – gross | 18 | 18 | |||
– Current – gross | 11 | 11 | |||
Trade receivables | 4 098 | 4 093 | 5 | ||
– Gross | 4 214 | 4 105 | 109 | ||
– Impairment allowances | (116) | (12) | (104) | ||
Other receivables | 132 | 131 | 1 | ||
– Gross | 140 | 131 | 9 | ||
– Impairment allowances | (8) | (8) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 20 630 | 20 630 | |||
Total financial assets at amortised cost | 25 312 | 25 164 | 142 | 6 |
1 | Lease receivables are within the scope of the impairment requirements of IFRS 9. |