Currently viewing Annual Financial Report 2018
16.1.1 FINANCIAL ASSETS
(i) Classification
The group and company classifies its financial assets in the following measurement categories:
The classification depends on the group’s and company’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the cash flows.
For assets measured at fair value, gains and losses will either be recorded in profit or loss or OCI. For investments in equity instruments that are not held for trading, this will depend on whether the group or company has made an irrevocable election at the time of initial recognition to account for the equity investment at FVOCI.
The group and company reclassifies debt investments when, and only when, its business model for managing those assets changes.
(ii) Measurement
At initial recognition, the group and company measures a financial asset at its fair value-plus, in the case of a financial asset not at FVPL, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Transaction costs of financial assets carried at FVPL are expensed in profit or loss.
Financial assets with embedded derivatives are considered in their entirety when determining whether their cash flows are SPPI.
Debt instruments
Subsequent measurement of debt instruments depends on the group’s and company’s business model for managing the asset and the cash flow characteristics of the asset. Currently there are two measurement categories into which the group and company classifies its debt instruments, as the group and company do not hold any debt instruments classified as FVOCI, as summarised in the table below.
Category | Financial instruments | Business model and cash flow characteristics | Movements in carrying amount | Derecognition | Impairment | ||||||||||
Amortised cost |
|
Financial assets that are held for collection of contractual cash flows where those cash flows represent SPPI. | Interest income from these financial assets is included in finance income using the effective interest rate method. Foreign exchange gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss. |
Any gain or loss arising on derecognition is recognised directly in profit or loss and presented in operating expenses. | Impairment losses are presented as a separate line item in the notes to the statement of comprehensive income. The impairment losses are considered to be immaterial and therefore it has not been presented as a separate line on the face of the statement of comprehensive income. | ||||||||||
FVPL |
|
Financial assets that do not meet the criteria for amortised cost or FVOCI. | Gains and losses on a debt investment that is subsequently measured at FVPL is recognised in profit or loss and presented on a net basis within operating expenses in the period in which it arises. Interest income is recognised in profit or loss. | Any gain or loss arising on derecognition is recognised directly in profit or loss and presented in operating expenses. | Debt instruments measured at FVPL are not subject to the impairment model in terms of IFRS 9. |
Equity instruments
Equity investments are subsequently measured at fair value. Management has elected to present fair value gains and losses on equity investments in OCI, there is no subsequent reclassification of fair value gains and losses to profit or loss following the derecognition of the investment. Dividends from such investments continue to be recognised in profit or loss as income from financial assets when the group’s and company’s right to receive payments is established.
Changes in the fair value of financial assets at FVPL are recognised in operating expenses in the statement of comprehensive income as applicable. Impairment losses (and reversal of impairment losses) on equity investments measured at FVOCI are not reported separately from other changes in fair value.
(iii) Impairment
The group and company assesses on a forward-looking basis the ECLs associated with its debt instruments carried at amortised cost. The impairment methodology applied depends on whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk.
ECLs are a probability-weighted estimate of credit losses. Credit losses are measured as the present value of all cash shortfalls (ie the difference between the cash flows due to the group in accordance with the contract and the cash flows that the group and company expects to receive). ECLs are discounted at the effective interest rate of the financial asset.
Expected credit loss allowances are measured on either of the following bases:
For trade receivables, the group and company applies the simplified approach permitted by IFRS 9, which requires lifetime ECLs to be recognised from initial recognition of the receivables. To measure the ECLs, trade receivables are grouped based on shared credit risk characteristics (corporate entities, small medium enterprises and public sector entities) and the days past due to assess significant increase in credit risk. In addition, forward-looking macro economic conditions and factors are considered when determining the ECLs for trade receivables, namely trading conditions in the domestic and international coal markets, domestic and export coal prices as well as economic growth and inflationary outlook in the short term. Trade receivables are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery. Indicators that there is no reasonable expectation of recovery include, among others, the failure of a debtor to engage in a repayment plan with the group and company, and a failure to make contractual payments for a period of greater than 120 days past due.
For other financial assets measured at amortised cost, the ECL is based on the 12-month expected credit loss allowance or a lifetime expected credit loss allowance. The 12-month expected credit loss allowance is the portion of lifetime expected credit loss allowances that result from default events on a financial instrument that are possible within 12 months after the reporting date. However, when there has been a significant increase in credit risk since origination, the ECL will be based on the lifetime expected credit loss allowances.
The group and company assumes that the credit risk on a financial asset has increased significantly if it is more than 30 days past due.
The group and company considers a financial asset to be in default when contractual payments are 90 days past due. However, in certain cases, the group and company may also consider a financial asset to be in default when internal or external information indicates that the group and company is unlikely to receive the outstanding contractual amounts in full before taking into account any credit enhancements held by the group and company.
The financial assets measured at amortised cost are categorised as follows:
Category | Definition | Basis for recognition of expected credit loss allowance | ||
Performing | Counterparty has a low risk of default and a strong capacity to meet contractual cash flows of capital and/or interest (where applicable) | 12-month expected credit losses. Where the expected lifetime of a financial asset measured at amortised cost is less than 12 months, expected credit losses are measured at its expected lifetime. | ||
Under-performing | There is a significant increase in credit risk of the counterparty since initial recognition. A significant increase in credit risk is presumed if principal and/or interest (where applicable) payments are 30 to 90 days past due | Lifetime expected credit losses | ||
Non-performing | Counterparty has a high risk of default and there is a high probability that the counterparty will be unable to meet contractual cash flows of principal and/or interest (where applicable). There has been a further significant increase in credit risk since recognition. A further significant increase in credit risk is presumed if the principal and/or interest (where applicable) repayments are more than 90 days past due | Lifetime expected credit losses | ||
Write-off | There is no reasonable expectation that the principal and/or interest (where applicable) will be recovered | Financial asset measured at amortised cost is written off |
16.1.2 LOAN COMMITMENTS ISSUED BY THE GROUP AND COMPANY
Undrawn loan commitments are commitments under which, over the duration of the commitment, the group and company is required to provide a loan with pre-specified terms to the counterparty. These contracts are in the scope of the ECL requirements of IFRS 9.
When estimating 12-month or lifetime ECLs for undrawn loan commitments, the group and company estimates the expected portion of the loan commitment that will be drawn down over 12 months or its expected life, respectively. The ECL is then based on the present value of the expected shortfalls in cash flows if the loan is drawn down, based on a probability-weighting. The cash shortfalls include the realisation of any collateral. The expected cash shortfalls are discounted at an approximation to the expected effective interest rate on the loan.
In applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, management makes judgements and assumptions in determining the impairment losses to be recognised in relation to financial assets. The expected credit loss allowances for financial assets are based on assumptions about risk of default and expected loss rates. The group and company uses judgement in making these assumptions and selecting the inputs to the impairment calculation, based on the group’s and company’s past history, existing market conditions as well as forward looking estimates at the end of each reporting period.
16.3.1 CARRYING AMOUNTS AND FAIR VALUE AMOUNTS OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The tables below set out the group’s and company’s classification of each category of financial assets and financial liabilities.
Group | |||||||||
At 31 December 2018 | Financial assets at FVOCI Rm |
Financial assets at FVPL Rm |
Financial assets at amortised cost Rm |
Financial liabilities at FVPL Rm |
Financial liabilities at amortised cost Rm |
Total carrying amount Rm |
|||
Financial assets | |||||||||
Non-current | |||||||||
Financial assets, consisting of: | |||||||||
– Equity: unlisted | |||||||||
Chifeng | 185 | 185 | |||||||
– Debt: unlisted | |||||||||
Environmental rehabilitation funds | 1 432 | 1 432 | |||||||
– Loans to associates and joint ventures | 250 | 250 | |||||||
– ESD loans | 80 | 80 | |||||||
– Other financial assets at amortised cost | 687 | 687 | |||||||
Total non-current financial assets | 185 | 1 432 | 1 017 | 2 634 | |||||
Current | |||||||||
Financial assets, consisting of: | |||||||||
– Loans to associates and joint ventures | 9 | 9 | |||||||
– ESD loans | 45 | 45 | |||||||
– Other financial assets at amortised cost | 80 | 80 | |||||||
Trade and other receivables, consisting of: | |||||||||
– Trade receivables | 2 971 | 2 971 | |||||||
– Other receivables | 169 | 169 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2 080 | 2 080 | |||||||
Total current financial assets | 5 354 | 5 354 | |||||||
Total financial assets | 185 | 1 432 | 6 371 | 7 988 | |||||
Financial liabilities | |||||||||
Non-current | |||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings (excluding finance leases) | 3 843 | 3 843 | |||||||
Non-current other payables | 152 | 152 | |||||||
Financial liabilities, consisting of: | |||||||||
– Contingent consideration | 488 | 488 | |||||||
– Deferred consideration payable | 225 | 225 | |||||||
Total non-current financial liabilities | 488 | 4 220 | 4 708 | ||||||
Current | |||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings (excluding finance leases) | 571 | 571 | |||||||
Trade and other payables | 2 960 | 2 960 | |||||||
Financial liabilities, consisting of: | |||||||||
– Derivative financial liabilities | 1 | 1 | |||||||
– Contingent consideration | 361 | 361 | |||||||
– Deferred consideration payable | 395 | 395 | |||||||
Overdraft | 1 531 | 1 531 | |||||||
Total current financial liabilities | 362 | 5 457 | 5 819 | ||||||
Total financial liabilities | 850 | 9 677 | 10 527 |
Due to the short-term nature of the current financial assets and current financial liabilities, the carrying amount is assumed to be the same as the fair value.
The carrying amounts of non-current financial instruments measured at amortised cost approximate fair value due to the nature and terms of these instruments.
Group | ||||||||||
At fair value through profit or loss |
||||||||||
At 31 December 2017 (Re-presented) | Held- for- trading Rm |
Designated Rm |
Loans and receivables at amortised cost Rm |
Availablefor- sale financial assets at fair value Rm |
Financial liabilities at amortised cost Rm |
Non- financial assets and non- financial liabilities at cost Rm |
Total carrying amount Rm |
|||
Financial assets | ||||||||||
Non-current | ||||||||||
Financial assets, consisting of: | ||||||||||
– Environmental rehabilitation funds | 1 357 | 291 | 1 648 | |||||||
– Loans to joint venture | 126 | 126 | ||||||||
– Preference dividends receivable from associate | 2 | 2 | ||||||||
– KIO | 34 | 34 | ||||||||
– Chifeng | 152 | 152 | ||||||||
– Non-current receivables | 389 | 389 | ||||||||
Total non-current financial assets | 1 391 | 808 | 152 | 2 351 | ||||||
Current | ||||||||||
Financial assets, consisting of: | ||||||||||
– Current portion of non-current receivable | 48 | 48 | ||||||||
Trade and other receivables, consisting of: | ||||||||||
– Trade receivables | 2 506 | 2 506 | ||||||||
– Other receivables | 103 | 103 | ||||||||
– Derivative financial asset | 4 | 4 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 6 657 | 6 657 | ||||||||
Total current financial assets | 4 | 9 314 | 9 318 | |||||||
Non-current assets held-for-sale | 53 | 3 857 | 3 910 | |||||||
Total financial assets | 4 | 1 391 | 10 175 | 152 | 3 857 | 15 579 | ||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||||
Non-current | ||||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | 6 477 | 3 | 6 480 | |||||||
Non-current other payables | 89 | 89 | ||||||||
Financial liabilities, consisting of: | ||||||||||
– Contingent consideration | 414 | 414 | ||||||||
Total non-current financial liabilities | 414 | 6 566 | 3 | 6 983 | ||||||
Current | ||||||||||
Financial liabilities, consisting of: | ||||||||||
– Contingent consideration | 309 | 309 | ||||||||
Trade and other payables, consisting of: | ||||||||||
– Trade and other payables | 2 239 | 2 239 | ||||||||
– Derivative financial liability | 6 | 6 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | 52 | 16 | 68 | |||||||
Overdraft | 54 | 54 | ||||||||
Total current financial liabilities | 6 | 309 | 2 345 | 16 | 2 676 | |||||
Non-current liabilities held-for-sale | 80 | 1 572 | 1 652 | |||||||
Total financial liabilities | 6 | 723 | 8 991 | 1 591 | 11 311 |
Due to the short-term nature of the current financial assets and current financial liabilities, the carrying amount is assumed to be the same as the fair value.
The carrying amounts of non-current financial instruments measured at amortised cost approximate fair value due to the nature and terms of these instruments.
Company | ||||||||
At 31 December 2018 | Financial assets at FVPL Rm |
Financial assets at amortised cost Rm |
Financial liabilities at FVPL Rm |
Financial liabilities at amortised cost Rm |
Total carrying amount Rm |
|||
Financial assets | ||||||||
Non-current | ||||||||
Financial assets, consisting of: | ||||||||
– Debt: unlisted | ||||||||
Environmental rehabilitation funds | 26 | 26 | ||||||
– ESD loans | 80 | 80 | ||||||
– Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 3 500 | 3 500 | ||||||
Total non-current financial assets | 26 | 3 580 | 3 606 | |||||
Current | ||||||||
Financial assets, consisting of: | ||||||||
– ESD loans | 45 | 45 | ||||||
– Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 586 | 586 | ||||||
– Non-interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 341 | 341 | ||||||
– Treasury facilities with subsidiaries at amortised cost | 1 611 | 1 611 | ||||||
Trade and other receivables, consisting of: | ||||||||
– Other receivables | 19 | 19 | ||||||
– Indebtedness by subsidiaries | 194 | 194 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 676 | 676 | ||||||
Total current financial assets | 3 472 | 3 472 | ||||||
Non-current assets held-for-sale | 408 | 408 | ||||||
Total financial assets | 26 | 7 460 | 7 486 | |||||
Financial liabilities | ||||||||
Non-current | ||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings (excluding finance leases) | 3 233 | 3 233 | ||||||
Financial liabilities, consisting of: | ||||||||
– Contingent consideration | 488 | 488 | ||||||
– Put option | 584 | 584 | ||||||
– Deferred consideration payable | 225 | 225 | ||||||
Total non-current financial liabilities | 1 072 | 3 458 | 4 530 | |||||
Current | ||||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings (excluding finance leases) | 572 | 572 | ||||||
Trade and other payables | 176 | 176 | ||||||
Financial liabilities, consisting of: | ||||||||
– Contingent consideration | 361 | 361 | ||||||
– Deferred consideration payable | 395 | 395 | ||||||
– Non-interest-bearing loans from subsidiary | 8 197 | 8 197 | ||||||
– Treasury facilities with subsidiaries at amortised cost | 1 886 | 1 886 | ||||||
Overdraft | 1 046 | 1 046 | ||||||
Total current financial liabilities | 361 | 12 272 | 12 633 | |||||
Total financial liabilities | 1 433 | 15 730 | 17 163 |
Due to the short-term nature of the current financial assets and current financial liabilities, the carrying amount is assumed to be the same as the fair value.
The carrying amounts of non-current financial instruments measured at amortised cost approximate fair value due to the nature and terms of these instruments.
Company | ||||||
At 31 December 2017 (Restated) | Designated at fair value through profit or loss Rm |
Loans and receivables at amortised cost Rm |
Financial liabilities at amortised cost Rm |
Total carrying amount Rm |
||
Financial assets | ||||||
Non-current | ||||||
Financial assets, consisting of: | ||||||
– Environmental rehabilitation funds | 26 | 26 | ||||
– Loan to joint venture | 186 | 186 | ||||
– Preference dividends receivable from associate | 2 | 2 | ||||
– Non-current receivables | 408 | 408 | ||||
– Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 4 020 | 4 020 | ||||
Total non-current financial assets | 26 | 4 616 | 4 642 | |||
Current | ||||||
Financial assets, consisting of: | ||||||
– Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 25 | 25 | ||||
Trade and other receivables, consisting of: | ||||||
– Indebtedness by subsidiaries | 1 438 | 1 438 | ||||
– Other receivables | 20 | 20 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 5 555 | 5 555 | ||||
Total current financial assets | 7 038 | 7 038 | ||||
Total financial assets | 26 | 11 654 | 11 680 | |||
Financial liabilities | ||||||
Non-current | ||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | 3 994 | 3 994 | ||||
Financial liabilities, consisting of: | ||||||
– Contingent consideration | 414 | 414 | ||||
– Put option | 2 377 | 2 377 | ||||
Total non-current financial liabilities | 2 791 | 3 994 | 6 785 | |||
Current | ||||||
Financial liabilities, consisting of: | ||||||
– Contingent consideration | 309 | 309 | ||||
Trade and other payables | 9 782 | 9 782 | ||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | 57 | 57 | ||||
Overdraft | 37 | 37 | ||||
Total current financial liabilities | 309 | 9 876 | 10 185 | |||
Total financial liabilities | 3 100 | 13 870 | 16 970 |
Due to the short-term nature of the current financial assets and current financial liabilities, the carrying amount is assumed to be the same as the fair value.
The carrying amounts of non-current financial instruments measured at amortised cost approximate fair value due to the nature and terms of these adjustments.
16.3.2 FAIR VALUES
16.3.2.1 Fair value hierarchy
Financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value have been categorised in the following hierarchy structure, based on the input
used in the valuation technique:
Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets that the group can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3 — Inputs that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
Group | Fair value Rm |
Level 2 Rm |
Level 3 Rm |
|
2018 | ||||
Financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income | ||||
Equity – unlisted | 185 | 185 | ||
– Chifeng | 185 | 185 | ||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | ||||
Debt – unlisted | 1 432 | 1 432 | ||
– Environmental rehabilitation funds | 1 432 | 1 432 | ||
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | (849) | (849) | ||
Non-current contingent consideration | (488) | (488) | ||
Current contingent consideration | (361) | (361) | ||
Derivative financial liabilities | (1) | (1) | ||
Net financial assets/(liabilities) held at fair value | 767 | 1 431 | (664) |
Reconciliation of Level 3 hierarchy | Contingent consideration Rm |
Chifeng1 Rm |
Total Rm |
|
Opening balance | (723) | 152 | (571) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Movement during the year | ||||
Losses recognised in profit or loss | (357) | (357) | ||
Gains recognised in other comprehensive income (pre-tax effect)2 | 33 | 33 | ||
Settlements | 299 | 299 | ||
Exchange losses recognised in profit or loss | (68) | (68) | ||
Closing balance | (849) | 185 | (664) |
1 | Before 1 January 2018, the Chifeng equity investment was classified as available-for-sale in accordance with IAS 39. From 1 January 2018, the Chifeng equity investment is classified at FVOCI in accordance with IFRS 9. |
2 | Tax on Chifeng amounts to R12 million (2017: R12 million). |
Group | Fair value Rm |
Level 1 Rm |
Level 2 Rm |
Level 3 Rm |
|
2017 | |||||
Financial assets held-for-trading at fair value through profit or loss | 4 | 4 | |||
Current derivative financial assets | 4 | 4 | |||
Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 1 391 | 1 391 | |||
Environmental rehabilitation funds | 1 357 | 1 357 | |||
KIO | 34 | 34 | |||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 152 | 152 | |||
Chifeng | 152 | 152 | |||
Financial liabilities held-for-trading at fair value through profit or loss | (6) | (6) | |||
Current derivative financial liabilities | (6) | (6) | |||
Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | (723) | (723) | |||
Non-current contingent consideration | (414) | (414) | |||
Current contingent consideration | (309) | (309) | |||
Net financial assets/(liabilities) held at fair value | 818 | 1 391 | (2) | (571) |
Reconciliation of Level 3 hierarchy | Contingent consideration Rm |
Chifeng Rm |
Total Rm |
|
Opening balance | (483) | 178 | (305) | |
Movement during the year | ||||
Losses recognised in profit or loss | (354) | (354) | ||
Losses recognised in other comprehensive income (pre-tax effect) | (26) | (26) | ||
Settlements | 74 | 74 | ||
Exchange gains recognised in profit or loss | 40 | 40 | ||
Closing balance | (723) | 152 | (571) |
Company | Fair value Rm |
Level 2 Rm |
Level 3 Rm |
|
2018 | ||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | ||||
Debt – unlisted | 26 | 26 | ||
– Environmental rehabilitation funds | 26 | 26 | ||
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | (1 433) | (1 433) | ||
Non-current contingent consideration | (488) | (488) | ||
Current contingent consideration | (361) | (361) | ||
Put option | (584) | (584) | ||
Net financial (liabilities)/assets held at fair value | (1 407) | 26 | (1 433) |
Reconciliation of Level 3 hierarchy |
Put option Rm |
Contingent consideration Rm |
Total Rm |
|
Opening balance | (2 377) | (723) | (3 100) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Movement during the year | ||||
Losses recognised in the profit or loss | (1) | (357) | (358) | |
Option lapsed/settlements | 1 794 | 299 | 2 093 | |
Exchange losses recognised in profit or loss | (68) | (68) | ||
Closing balance | (584) | (849) | (1 433) |
Company | Fair value Rm |
Level 1 Rm |
Level 3 Rm |
|
2017 | ||||
Financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 26 | 26 | ||
Environmental rehabilitation funds | 26 | 26 | ||
Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | (3 100) | (3 100) | ||
Non-current contingent consideration | (414) | (414) | ||
Current contingent consideration | (309) | (309) | ||
Put option | (2 377) | (2 377) | ||
Net financial (liabilities)/assets held at fair value | (3 074) | 26 | (3 100) |
Reconciliation of Level 3 hierarchy |
Put option Rm |
Contingent consideration Rm |
Total Rm |
|
Opening balance | (483) | (483) | ||
Movement during the year | ||||
Losses recognised in profit or loss | (11) | (354) | (365) | |
Options granted | (2 366) | (2 366) | ||
Settlements | 74 | 74 | ||
Exchange gains recognised in profit or loss | 40 | 40 | ||
Closing balance | (2 377) | (723) | (3 100) |
16.3.2.2 Transfers
The group recognises transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy as at the end of the reporting period during which the transfer has occurred. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 nor between Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy during the periods ended 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2017, except for the environmental rehabilitation funds which were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 as a result of not applying the look-through principle, as shown in note 16.3.2.1
16.3.2.3 Valuation process applied by the group
The fair value computations of the investments are performed by the group’s corporate finance department, reporting to the finance director, on a six-monthly basis. The valuation reports are discussed with the chief operating decision maker and the audit committee in accordance with the group’s reporting governance.
16.3.2.4 Current derivative financial instruments
Level 2 fair values for simple over-the-counter derivative financial instruments are based on market quotes. These quotes are assessed for reasonableness by discounting estimated future cash flows using the market rate for similar instruments at measurement date.
16.3.2.5 Environmental rehabilitation funds
Level 2 fair values for debt instruments held in the environmental rehabilitation funds are based on quotes provided by the financial institutions at which the funds are invested at measurement date. These financial institutions invest in instruments which are listed.
16.3.2.6 Valuation techniques used in the determination of fair values within Level 3 of the hierarchy, as well as significant inputs used in the valuation models
(a) Chifeng
Chifeng is classified within a Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as there is no quoted market price or observable price available for this investment. This unlisted investment is valued as the present value of the estimated future cash flows, using a DCF model. The valuation technique is consistent to that used in previous reporting periods.
The significant observable and unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the investment in Chifeng are rand/ RMB exchange rate, RMB/US$ exchange rate, zinc LME price, production volumes, operational costs and the discount rate.
At 31 December 2018 | Inputs | Sensitivity of inputs and fair value measurement1 | Sensitivity analysis of a 10% increase in the inputs is demonstrated below2 Rm |
||
Observable inputs | |||||
Rand/RMB exchange rate | R2.10/RMB1 | Strengthening of the rand to the RMB | 19 | ||
RMB/US$ exchange rate | RMB6.56 to RMB7.01/US$1 | Strengthening of the RMB to the US$ | 110 | ||
Zinc LME price (US$ per tonne in real terms) | US$2 200.00 to US$2 474.72 | Increase in price of zinc concentrate | 110 | ||
Unobservable inputs | |||||
Production volumes | 85 000 tonnes | Increase in production volumes | 31 | ||
Operational costs (US$ million per annum in real terms) | US$60.59 to US$70.92 | Decrease in operations costs | (83) | ||
Discount rate | 11.11% | Decrease in the discount rate | (16) | ||
Observable inputs | |||||
Rand/RMB exchange rate | R1.90/RMB1 | Strengthening of the rand to the RMB | 15 | ||
RMB/US$ exchange rate | RMB6.52 to RMB7.28/US$1 | Strengthening of the RMB to the US$ | 100 | ||
Zinc LME price (US$ per tonne in real terms) | US$3 000 to US$2 100 | Increase in price of zinc concentrate | 100 | ||
Unobservable inputs | |||||
Production volumes | 85 000 tonnes | Increase in production volumes | 29 | ||
Operational costs (US$ million per annum in real terms) | US$58.46 to US$70.20 | Decrease in operations costs | (75) | ||
Discount rate | 11.05% | Decrease in the discount rate | (12) |
1 | Change in observable or unobservable input which will result in an increase in the fair value measurement. |
2 | A 10% decrease in the respective inputs would have an equal but opposite effect on the above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant. |
Inter-relationships
Any inter-relationships between unobservable inputs is not considered to have a significant impact within the range of reasonably possible alternative assumptions for both reporting periods.
(b) Contingent consideration
The potential undiscounted amount of the remaining deferred future payments that the group could be required to make under the ECC acquisition is between nil and US$60 million. The amount of future payments is dependent on the API4 coal price.
During 2018, there was an increase of US$25.4 million (R357 million) (2017: US$28.5 million (R354 million)) recognised in profit or loss for the contingent consideration arrangement.
API4 coal price range (US$/tonne) |
Future payment | |||||
Reference year | Minimum | Maximum | US$ million | |||
2015 | 60 | 80 | 10 | |||
2016 | 60 | 80 | 25 | |||
2017 | 60 | 80 | 25 | |||
2018 | 60 | 90 | 25 | |||
2019 | 60 | 90 | 35 |
The amount to be paid in each of the five years is determined as follows:
An additional payment to Total SA amounting to R299 million was required for the 2017 reference year and R74 million was required for the 2016 reference year as the API4 price was within the agreed range. No additional payment to Total SA was required for the 2015 reference year as the API4 price was below the range.
The contingent consideration is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as there is no quoted market price or observable price available for this financial instrument. This financial instrument is valued as the present value of the estimated future cash flows, using a DCF model.
The significant observable and unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of this financial instrument are rand/US$ exchange rate, API4 export price and the discount rate.
Inputs | Sensitivity of inputs and fair value measurement1 |
Sensitivity analysis of a 10% increase in the inputs is demonstrated below2 Rm |
|||
At 31 December 2018 | |||||
Observable inputs | |||||
Rand/US$ exchange rate | R14.43/US$1 | Strengthening of the rand to the US$ | 85 | ||
API4 export price (price per tonne)3 | US$90.00 to US$98.10 | Increase in API4 export price per tonne | |||
Unobservable inputs | |||||
Discount rate | 3.44% | Decrease in the discount rate | (16) | ||
At 31 December 2017 | |||||
Observable inputs | |||||
Rand/US$ exchange rate | R12.37/US$1 | Strengthening of the rand to the US$ | 72 | ||
API4 export price (price per tonne) | US$74.41 to US$84.35 | Increase in API4 export price per tonne | 180 | ||
Unobservable inputs | |||||
Discount rate | 3.44% | Decrease in the discount rate | (19) |
1 | Change in observable or unobservable input which will result in an increase in the fair value measurement. |
2 | A 10% decrease in the respective inputs would have an equal but opposite effect on the above, except for the API4 export price which would result in a decrease of R167 million for 2018 (2017: decrease of R245 million), on the basis that all other variables remain constant. |
3 | A 10% increase in the API4 export price would not have an impact on the fair value of the contingent consideration as the API4 export price is in excess of the maximum API4 coal price range. |
Inter-relationships
Any inter-relationships between unobservable inputs is not considered to have a significant impact within the range of reasonably possible alternative assumptions for the reporting periods.
(c) Put option
In terms of the Replacement BEE Transaction, Exxaro granted Eyesizwe the right to require Exxaro to buy back a certain number of Exxaro shares at a discount to the market price, subject to certain restrictions. The proceeds received by Eyesizwe upon exercise of the put option may only be used to settle the preference share liability. The put option therefore expires once the preference share liability has been fully settled. The put option can only be exercised if, the 20-day weighted average trading price of Exxaro’s shares is greater than 150% of the closing Exxaro share price on 11 December 2017 as per the agreement.
The put option is classified within a Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as there is no quoted market price or observable price available for this instrument. This instrument’s value is based on the present value of the preference share liability redemption amount.
16.3.3 RISK MANAGEMENT
16.3.3.1 Financial risk management
The group’s corporate treasury function provides financial risk management services to the business, coordinates access to domestic and international financial markets, and monitors and manages the financial risks relating to the operations of the group through internal risk reports which analyse exposure by degree and magnitude of risks. These risks include market risk (including foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.
The group’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing these risks are detailed below.
The group seeks to minimise the effects of these risks by using derivative financial instruments to hedge these risk exposures. The use of derivative financial instruments is governed by the group’s policies approved by the board of directors, which provide written principles on foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, the use of financial derivatives and non-derivative financial instruments, and the investment of excess liquidity. Compliance with policies and exposure limits is reviewed by the internal auditors on a continuous basis and the results are reported to the audit committee.
The group does not enter into or trade financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for speculative purposes. The group enters into financial instruments to manage and reduce the possible adverse impact on earnings and cash flows of changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices.
Capital management
In managing its capital, the group focuses on a sound net debt position, return on shareholders’ equity (or return on capital employed) and the level of dividends to shareholders. The group’s policy is to cover its annual net funding requirements through long-term loan facilities with maturities spread over time. Neither the company nor any of its subsidiaries are subject to externally imposed capital requirements.
16.3.3.2 Market risk management
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates, commodity prices and equity prices, will affect the group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments.
The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return on risk.
The group’s activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of changes in the environmental rehabilitation funds quoted prices (see 16.3.3.2.1 below), foreign currency exchange rates (see 16.3.3.2.2 below) and interest rates (see 16.3.3.2.3 below). The group enters into a variety of derivative financial instruments (which close out at year end) to manage its exposure to foreign currency risks and interest rate risks, including:
16.3.3.2.1 Price risk management
The group’s exposure to equity price risk arises from investments held by the group and classified either as at fair value through other comprehensive income or at fair value through profit or loss. Currently, the group’s exposure to equity price risk is not considered to be significant as Chifeng is seen as a non-core investment.
The group’s exposure to price risk in relation to quoted prices of the environmental rehabilitation funds is not considered a significant risk as the funds are invested with reputable financial institutions in accordance with a strict mandate to ensure capital preservation and growth. The funds are held for strategic purposes rather than trading purposes.
16.3.3.2.2 Foreign currency risk management
The group undertakes transactions denominated in foreign currencies, hence exposures to exchange rate fluctuations arise.
The currency in which transactions are entered into is mainly denominated in US dollar, euro and Australian dollar.
Exchange rate exposures are managed within approved policy parameters utilising FECs, currency options and currency swap agreements.
The group maintains a fully covered exchange rate position in respect of foreign currency borrowings and imported capital equipment resulting in these exposures being fully converted to rand. Trade-related import exposures are managed through the use of economic hedges arising from export revenue as well as through FECs. Trade-related export exposures are hedged using FECs and options with specific focus on short-term receivables.
Uncovered foreign debtors at 31 December 2018 amount to US$0.29 million (2017: nil), whereas uncovered cash and cash equivalents amount to US$37.29 million (2017: US$14.8 million).
All capital imports were fully hedged. Monetary items have been translated at the closing rate at the last day of the reporting period US$1:R14.43 (2017: US$1:R12.37).
The FECs which are used to hedge foreign currency exposure mostly have a maturity of less than one year from the reporting date. When necessary, FECs are rolled over at maturity.
The following significant exchange rates applied for both group and company during the year:
2018 | 2017 | ||||||||
Average spot rate |
Average achieved rate |
Closing spot rate |
Average spot rate |
Average achieved rate |
Closing spot rate |
||||
US$ | 13.24 | 12.93 | 14.43 | 13.30 | 13.49 | 12.37 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
€ | 15.60 | 16.50 | 15.03 | 13.85 | |||||
AU$ | 9.88 | 10.19 | 10.20 | 9.65 |
16.3.3.2.3 Interest rate risk management
The group is exposed to interest rate risk as it borrows and deposits funds at floating interest rates on the money market and extended bank borrowings.
The financial institutions chosen are subject to compliance with the relevant regulatory bodies. The interest-bearing borrowings were entered into at floating interest rates in anticipation of a decrease in the interest rate cycle.
The interest rate repricing profile for interest-bearing borrowings (excluding finance leases) is summarised below:
1 to 6 months Rm |
Total borrowings Rm |
||
At 31 December 2018 | |||
Non-current interest-bearing borrowings | 3 843 | 3 843 | |
Current interest-bearing borrowings | 571 | 571 | |
4 414 | 4 414 | ||
Total borrowings (%) | 100 | 100 | |
At 31 December 2017 (Re-presented) | |||
Non-current interest-bearing borrowings | 6 477 | 6 477 | |
Current interest-bearing borrowings | 52 | 52 | |
6 529 | 6 529 | ||
Total borrowings (%) | 100 | 100 |
Interest rate sensitivity
The following table reflects the potential impact on earnings, given an increase in interest rates of 50 basis points:
Loss | ||||
2018 Rm |
2017 Rm |
|||
Increase of 50 basis points in interest rate | (37) | (21) |
---|
A decrease in interest rates of 50 basis points would have had the equal but opposite effect on the amounts shown above, on the basis that all other variables remain constant.
16.3.3.3 Liquidity risk management
Liquidity risk is the risk that the group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The group’s approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the group’s reputation.
The ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the board of directors, which has built an appropriate liquidity risk management framework for the management of the group’s short, medium and long-term funding and liquidity management requirements.
The group manages liquidity risk by monitoring forecast cash flows in compliance with loan covenants and ensuring that adequate unutilised borrowing facilities are maintained. The group aims to cover at least its net debt requirements through long-term borrowing facilities.
Borrowing capacity is determined by the directors, from time to time.
Group | ||||
2018 Rm |
(Re-presented) 2017 Rm |
|||
Amount approved | 52 308 | 50 129 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total borrowings (excluding finance leases) | (4 414) | (6 529) | ||
Unutilised borrowing capacity | 47 894 | 43 600 |
The group’s capital base, the borrowing powers of the company and the group were set at 125% of shareholders’ funds for both the 2018 and 2017 financial years.
Standard payment terms for the majority of trade payables is the end of the month following the month in which the goods are received or services are rendered.
A number of trade payables do, however, have shorter contracted payment periods.
To avoid incurring interest on late payments, financial risk management policies and procedures are entrenched to ensure the timeous matching of orders placed with goods received notes or services acceptances and invoices.
16.3.3.3.1 Maturity profile of financial instruments
The following tables detail the group and company’s contractual maturities of financial assets and financial liabilities:
Maturity | |||||||
Group | Carrying amount Rm |
Contractual cash flows Rm |
0 to 12 months Rm |
1 to 2 years Rm |
2 to 5 years Rm |
More than 5 years Rm |
|
2018 | |||||||
Financial assets | |||||||
Loans to associates and joint ventures | 259 | 388 | 37 | 28 | 28 | 295 | |
ESD loans | 125 | 125 | 45 | 31 | 48 | 1 | |
Other financial assets at amortised cost1 | 416 | 522 | 110 | 82 | 248 | 82 | |
Trade and other receivables | 3 140 | 3 140 | 3 140 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2 080 | 2 080 | 2 080 | ||||
Total financial assets | 6 020 | 6 255 | 5 412 | 141 | 324 | 378 | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 87 | 2 | 5 | 6 | ||
Financial liabilities | |||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | (4 414) | (5 513) | (915) | (325) | (4 273) | ||
Non-current other payables | (152) | (152) | (86) | (66) | |||
Contingent consideration | (849) | (849) | (361) | (488) | |||
Deferred consideration | (620) | (620) | (395) | (225) | |||
Trade and other payables | (2 960) | (2 960) | (2 960) | ||||
Derivative financial liabilities | (1) | (1) | (1) | ||||
Overdraft | (1 531) | (1 531) | (1 531) | ||||
Total financial liabilities | (10 527) | (11 626) | (6 163) | (1 124) | (4 339) | ||
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 53 | 10 | 37 | |||
Liquidity gap identified2 | (4 507) | (5 371) | (751) | (983) | (4 015) | 378 |
1 | Excludes the environmental rehabilitation funds at amortised cost. |
2 | The liquidity gap identified will be funded by cash generated from operations and the undrawn facilities in place. |
Maturity | |||||||
Group | Carrying amount Rm |
Contractual cash flows Rm |
0 to 12 months Rm |
1 to 2 years Rm |
2 to 5 years Rm |
More than 5 years Rm |
|
2017 (Re-presented) | |||||||
Financial assets | |||||||
Loans to associates and joint ventures | 128 | 128 | 128 | ||||
Derivative financial asset | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||
Deferred pricing receivable | 437 | 577 | 82 | 82 | 248 | 165 | |
Trade and other receivables | 2 609 | 2 609 | 2 609 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 6 657 | 6 657 | 6 657 | ||||
Total financial assets | 9 835 | 9 975 | 9 352 | 82 | 248 | 293 | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 95 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
Financial liabilities | |||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | (6 529) | (9 160) | (408) | (901) | (7 721) | (130) | |
Non-current other payables | (89) | (89) | (8) | (81) | |||
Contingent consideration | (723) | (723) | (309) | (219) | (195) | ||
Overdraft | (54) | (54) | (54) | ||||
Trade and other payables | (2 239) | (2 239) | (2 239) | ||||
Derivative financial liability | (6) | (6) | (6) | ||||
Total financial liabilities | (9 640) | (12 271) | (3 016) | (1 128) | (7 997) | (130) | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 25 | 9 | 65 | 1 | ||
Liquidity gap identified1 | 195 | (2 296) | 6 336 | (1 046) | (7 749) | 163 |
1 | The liquidity gap identified will be funded by cash generated from operations and the undrawn facilities in place. |
Maturity | |||||||
Company | Carrying amount Rm |
Contractual cash flows Rm |
0 to 12 months Rm |
1 to 2 years Rm |
2 to 5 years Rm |
More than 5 years Rm |
|
2018 | |||||||
Financial assets | |||||||
ESD loans | 125 | 125 | 45 | 31 | 48 | 1 | |
Trade and other receivables | 213 | 213 | 213 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 676 | 676 | 676 | ||||
Non-interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 341 | 341 | 341 | ||||
Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 4 086 | 5 214 | 965 | 354 | 3 756 | 139 | |
Treasury facilities with subsidiaries at amortised cost | 1 611 | 1 611 | 1 611 | ||||
Total financial assets | 7 052 | 8 180 | 3 851 | 385 | 3 804 | 140 | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 47 | 5 | 46 | 2 | ||
Financial liabilities | |||||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | (3 805) | (4 676) | (916) | (326) | (3 434) | ||
Contingent consideration | (849) | (849) | (361) | (488) | |||
Put option | (584) | (800) | (800) | ||||
Deferred consideration | (620) | (620) | (395) | (225) | |||
Trade and other payables | (176) | (176) | (176) | ||||
Overdraft | (1 046) | (1 046) | (1 046) | ||||
Non-interest-bearing loans from subsidiaries1 | (8 197) | (8 197) | (8 197) | ||||
Treasury facilities with subsidiaries at amortised cost | (1 886) | (1 886) | (1 886) | ||||
Total financial liabilities | (17 163) | (18 250) | (12 977) | (1 039) | (4 234) | ||
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 71 | 6 | 23 | |||
Liquidity gap identified2 | (10 111) | (10 070) | (9 126) | (654) | (430) | 140 |
1 | The majority of the non-interest-bearing loans from subsidiaries are not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future. |
2 | The liquidity gap identified will be funded by cash generated from operations and the undrawn facilities in place. |
Maturity | |||||||
Company | Carrying amount Rm |
Contractual cash flows Rm |
0 to 12 months Rm |
1 to 2 years Rm |
2 to 5 years Rm |
More than 5 years Rm |
|
2017 | |||||||
Financial assets | |||||||
Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 4 045 | 5 460 | 439 | 907 | 3 984 | 130 | |
Loan to joint venture | 188 | 188 | 188 | ||||
Non-current receivable | 408 | 408 | 408 | ||||
Trade and other receivables | 1 458 | 1 458 | 1 458 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 5 555 | 5 555 | 5 555 | ||||
Total financial assets | 11 654 | 13 069 | 7 452 | 907 | 3 984 | 726 | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 57 | 7 | 31 | 6 | ||
Financial liabilities | |||||||
Put option | (2 377) | (3 560) | (3 560) | ||||
Interest-bearing borrowings | (4 051) | (5 413) | (408) | (901) | (3 974) | (130) | |
Contingent consideration | (723) | (723) | (309) | (219) | (195) | ||
Overdraft | (37) | (37) | (37) | ||||
Trade and other payables | (9 782) | (9 782) | (9 782) | ||||
Total financial liabilities | (16 970) | (19 515) | (10 536) | (1 120) | (4 169) | (3 690) | |
Percentage profile (%) | 100 | 54 | 6 | 21 | 19 | ||
Liquidity gap identified1 | (5 316) | (6 446) | (3 084) | (213) | (185) | (2 964) |
1 | The liquidity gap identified will be funded by cash generated from operations and the undrawn facilities in place. The majority of trade and other payables represent intercompany loans which are not expected to be repaid in the foreseeable future. |
16.3.3.4 Credit risk management
Credit risk relates to potential default by counterparties on cash and cash equivalents, loans, investments, trade receivables and other receivables.
The group limits its counterparty exposure arising from money market and derivative instruments by only dealing with well-established financial institutions of high credit standing. The group exposure and the credit ratings of its counterparties are continuously monitored and the aggregate value of transactions concluded are spread among approved counterparties. Credit exposure is controlled by counterparty limits that are reviewed and approved by the board of directors annually.
Trade receivables consist of a number of customers with whom Exxaro has long-standing relationships. A high portion of term supply arrangements exists with such clients resulting in limited credit exposure which exposure is limited by performing customer creditworthiness or country risk assessments.
The group strives to enter into sales contracts with clients which stipulate the required payment terms. It is expected of each customer that these payment terms are adhered to. Where trade receivables balances become past due, the normal recovery procedures are followed to recover the debt, where applicable new payment terms may be arranged to ensure that the debt is fully recovered.
Exxaro has concentration risk as a result of its exposure to having one major customer. This is, however, not considered significant as the customer adheres to the stipulated payment terms.
Exxaro establishes an allowance for non-recoverability or impairment that represents its estimate of expected credit losses in respect of trade receivables, other receivables, loans, cash and cash equivalents and investments. The main components of these allowances are a 12-month ECL component that results from possible default events within the 12 months after the reporting date and a lifetime ECL component that results from all possible default events over the expected life of a financial instrument.
16.3.3.4.1 Exposure to credit risk
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. None of the financial assets below were held as collateral for any security provided.
Detail of the trade receivables credit risk exposure:
Group | ||||
2018 % |
2017 % |
|||
By geographical area | ||||
RSA | 66 | 69 | ||
Europe | 21 | 15 | ||
Asia | 11 | 12 | ||
USA | 2 | 2 | ||
Australia | 2 | |||
Total | 100 | 100 | ||
By industry | ||||
Public utilities | 45 | 50 | ||
Structural metal | 3 | |||
Cement | 1 | 6 | ||
Mining | 41 | 10 | ||
Manufacturing | 1 | 3 | ||
Merchants | 1 | 26 | ||
Food and beverage | 1 | |||
Steel | 10 | 2 | ||
Total | 100 | 100 |
Detailed impairment analysis of financial assets measured at amortised cost:
Group | Total Rm | Performing Rm |
Under- performing Rm |
Non- performing Rm |
|
2018 | |||||
Loans to associates and joint ventures | 259 | 259 | |||
ESD loans | 125 | 125 | |||
Other financial assets at amortised cost | 767 | 767 | |||
– Other financial assets at amortised cost – non-current – gross | 687 | 687 | |||
– Other financial assets at amortised cost – current – gross | 85 | 81 | 4 | ||
– Impairment allowances of current other financial assets at amortised cost | (5) | (1) | (4) | ||
Lease receivables1 | 71 | 71 | |||
Trade receivables | 2 971 | 2 922 | 41 | 8 | |
– Trade receivables – gross | 3 052 | 2 930 | 41 | 81 | |
– Impairment allowances of trade receivables | (81) | (8) | (73) | ||
Other receivables | 169 | 149 | 20 | ||
– Other receivables – gross | 223 | 149 | 20 | 54 | |
– Impairment allowances of other receivables | (54) | (54) | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2 080 | 2 080 | |||
Total financial assets at amortised cost | 6 442 | 6 373 | 61 | 8 |
1 | Lease receivables are within the scope of the impairment requirements of IFRS 9. |
Company | Total Rm | Performing Rm |
Under- performing Rm |
Non- performing Rm |
|
2018 | |||||
ESD loans | 125 | 125 | |||
Other financial assets at amortised cost | |||||
– Other financial assets at amortised cost – current – gross | 4 | 4 | |||
– Impairment allowances of current other financial assets at amortised cost | (4) | (4) | |||
Other receivables | 19 | 11 | 8 | ||
Indebtedness to subsidiaries | 194 | 194 | |||
Non-interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 341 | 341 | |||
– Non-interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries – gross | 401 | 341 | 60 | ||
– Impairment allowances of non-interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | (60) | (60) | |||
Interest-bearing loans to subsidiaries | 4 086 | 4 086 | |||
Treasury facilities with subsidiaries at amortised cost | 1 611 | 1 611 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 676 | 676 | |||
Total financial assets at amortised cost | 7 052 | 7 044 | 8 |
16.3.3.4.2 Trade and other receivables age analysis
Current | Past due | ||||||||
Group | Total Rm | 1 to 30 days Rm |
31 to 60 days Rm |
61 to 90 days Rm |
90 to 180 days Rm |
>180 days Rm |
|||
2018 | |||||||||
Trade receivables | 2 971 | 2 863 | 100 | 6 | 1 | 1 | |||
– Trade receivables: gross | 3 052 | 2 870 | 100 | 6 | 4 | 72 | |||
– Impairment allowances of trade receivables | (81) | (7) | (3) | (71) | |||||
Other receivables | 169 | 69 | 82 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |||
– Other receivables: gross | 223 | 78 | 86 | 7 | 41 | 11 | |||
– Impairment allowances of other receivables | (54) | (9) | (4) | (4) | (37) | ||||
Total carrying amount of trade and other receivables | 3 140 | 2 932 | 182 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
Current | Past due | |||||
Company | Total Rm | 1 to 30 days Rm |
>180 days Rm |
|||
2018 | ||||||
Other receivables | 19 | 11 | 8 | |||
Indebtedness by subsidiaries | 194 | 194 | ||||
Total carrying amount of trade and other receivables | 213 | 205 | 8 |
16.3.3.4.3 Credit quality of financial assets
The credit quality of cash and cash equivalents has been assessed by reference to external credit ratings available from Fitch and Standard & Poor’s.
Group | Company | ||||||||
2018 Rm |
Re-presented) 2017 Rm |
2018 Rm |
(Re-presented) 2017 Rm |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||||
Fitch ratings | |||||||||
F1+ | 88 | 6 487 | 14 | 5 555 | |||||
Standard & Poor’s ratings | |||||||||
A-1+ | 1 457 | 11 | 662 | ||||||
A-1 | 535 | 159 | |||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents1 | 2 080 | 6 657 | 676 | 5 555 |
1 | Excludes overdraft and cash and cash equivalents classified as held-for-sale. |
Fitch ratings
F1 Highest credit quality
“+” denotes any exceptionally strong credit feature
Standard & Poor’s
A-1+ Highest certainty of payment
A-1 Very high certainty of payment
16.3.3.4.4 Collateral
No collateral was held by the group as security and other enhancements over the financial assets during the years ended 31 December 2018 and 2017.
Guarantees
The group did not obtain financial or non-financial assets by taking possession of collateral it holds as security or calling on guarantees during the financial year ended 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2017. The guarantees issued relate to operational liabilities (refer note 13.4 on contingent liabilities).
16.3.4 LOAN COMMITMENTS
The group and company have granted the following loan commitments:
Group | Company | ||||||||
2018 Rm |
2017 Rm |
2018 Rm |
2017 Rm |
||||||
Total loan commitment | 1 221 | 721 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mafube1 | 500 | 721 | |||||||
AgriProtein2 | 721 | 721 | |||||||
Undrawn loan commitment | 971 | ||||||||
Mafube | 250 | ||||||||
AgriProtein | 721 | 721 | |||||||
1 | Revolving credit facility available for five years, ending 2023. |
2 | A US$50 million term loan facility available from 2020 to 2025. |
Group | Company | ||||||||
2018 Rm |
(Re-presented) 2017 Rm |
2018 Rm |
(Re-presented) 2017 Rm |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2 080 | 6 657 | 676 | 5 555 | |||||
Bank overdraft | (1 531) | (54) | (1 046) | (37) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents classified as held-for-sale | 14 | ||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 549 | 6 617 | (370) | 5 518 |